Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ä¡¾ÆÇ¥¸é °ÅÄ¥±â¿Í ½Ã¸àÆ® Á¾·ù°¡ ÀüºÎÁÖÁ¶°üÀÇ À¯Áö·Â¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

INFLUENCE OF TOOTH SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND TYPE OF CEMENT ON RETENTION OF COMPLETE CAST CROWNS

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 37±Ç 4È£ p.465 ~ 473
±è±æ¼ö, ¼Ûâ¿ë, ¾È½Â±Ù, ¹ÚÂù¿î,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è±æ¼ö ( Kim Kil-Su ) - ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
¼Ûâ¿ë ( Song Chang-Yong ) - ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
¾È½Â±Ù ( Ahn Seung-Geun ) - ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
¹ÚÂù¿î ( Park Charn-Woon ) - ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract


Bond strength of luting cements to dentin is a critical consideration for success of complete cast crowns. This study was performed to evaluate the relationship between surface characteristics of teeth prepared for complete cast crowns and retention of cemented restorations. Eighty artificial crowns were cast for standardized complete crown tooth preparations accomplished with the use of a special device on recently extracted human teeth. Coarse diamond(#102R, Shofu) and superfine finishing diamond(#SF102R, Shofu) burs of similar shape were used. Crowns in each group were randomly subdivided into four subgroups of 10 for luting cements selected for this study: zinc phosphate cement (FLECK¡¯S), polycarboxylate cement (Poly-F), reinforced glass ionomer cement (Fuji PLUS), and adhesive resin cement (Panavia 21). Retention was evaluated by measuring the tensile load required to dislodge the artificial crown from tooth preparations with an Instron testing machine, and analysed by one-way ANOVA and Student¡¯s t-test. The obtained results were as follows ; 1. When tooth preparation was done with coarse diamond bur, retentive force was diminished in order of Panavia 21, Fuji PLUS, FLECK¡¯S, and Poly-F. Retentive forces showed the significant difference between Fuji PLUS group and FLECK¡¯S group(p<0.001). 2. When tooth preparation was done with superfine diamond bur, retentive force was diminished in order of Fuji PLUS, Panavia 21, FLECK¡¯S and Poly-F. Retentive forces showed the significant difference between Panavia 21 group and FLECK¡¯S group(p<0.001). 3. Retentive force in coarse tooth surfaces was significantly higher than that in superfine tooth surface with all luting cements(p<0.001), and cement residues were almost retained with in the cast crown in all groups.

Å°¿öµå

Dental cement; Surface roughness; Tensile bond strength

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed